<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Tweet Adder Be Considered Black Hat SEO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.natebal.com/2009/12/tweet-adder-considered-black-hat-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.natebal.com/2009/12/tweet-adder-considered-black-hat-seo/</link>
	<description>Website Design Tutorials And Social Media Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:37:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Balcom</title>
		<link>http://www.natebal.com/2009/12/tweet-adder-considered-black-hat-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Balcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natebal.com/?p=26#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Hello Keller,

I&#039;m more interested in good web practices. Automation just seems like a bit of trickery that will be banned by the major SE&#039;s in the future. I&#039;m kind of surprised Google hasn&#039;t set a policy for these type of programs yet. Only a matter of time IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Keller,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m more interested in good web practices. Automation just seems like a bit of trickery that will be banned by the major SE&#8217;s in the future. I&#8217;m kind of surprised Google hasn&#8217;t set a policy for these type of programs yet. Only a matter of time IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Balcom</title>
		<link>http://www.natebal.com/2009/12/tweet-adder-considered-black-hat-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Balcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natebal.com/?p=26#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Hello Austin,

I feel the same way. I only follow people I am truly interested in. I don&#039;t know how you can maintain a truly social network with too many people. With that said every review I&#039;ve read about Tweet Adder was positive. I tried the free trial, but couldn&#039;t really get behind automating something like this. It just seems like a bad practice to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Austin,</p>
<p>I feel the same way. I only follow people I am truly interested in. I don&#8217;t know how you can maintain a truly social network with too many people. With that said every review I&#8217;ve read about Tweet Adder was positive. I tried the free trial, but couldn&#8217;t really get behind automating something like this. It just seems like a bad practice to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.natebal.com/2009/12/tweet-adder-considered-black-hat-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natebal.com/?p=26#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if I would call it black hat SEO, but I would call it spamming, I used it once (as in one time). And found the actual quality of my followers was really low, nobody really cared about what I posted.

The only way to be good on Twitter is to actively communicate and retweet relevant information. Engage in dialogue with people who actually follow you back. I don&#039;t see anything wrong with a bulk unfollow, because hey, we are all trying to network here aren&#039;t we? There are other places to do that though. 

I think if someone follows you on twitter from your area (geographic or expertise) you should automatically follow them back otherwise, you are that cool kid in class who only follows a few people, and thinks they are better than everyone else. 

Follow those of like mind, interact with them, offer relevant information, and you will master twitter. That being said, don&#039;t self promote too much, it&#039;s been shown that Twitter is a better place to brand a person than an actual product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if I would call it black hat SEO, but I would call it spamming, I used it once (as in one time). And found the actual quality of my followers was really low, nobody really cared about what I posted.</p>
<p>The only way to be good on Twitter is to actively communicate and retweet relevant information. Engage in dialogue with people who actually follow you back. I don&#8217;t see anything wrong with a bulk unfollow, because hey, we are all trying to network here aren&#8217;t we? There are other places to do that though. </p>
<p>I think if someone follows you on twitter from your area (geographic or expertise) you should automatically follow them back otherwise, you are that cool kid in class who only follows a few people, and thinks they are better than everyone else. </p>
<p>Follow those of like mind, interact with them, offer relevant information, and you will master twitter. That being said, don&#8217;t self promote too much, it&#8217;s been shown that Twitter is a better place to brand a person than an actual product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keller Hawthorne</title>
		<link>http://www.natebal.com/2009/12/tweet-adder-considered-black-hat-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Keller Hawthorne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.natebal.com/?p=26#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I used similar services in the very beginning of my blogging and I had the same feeling.  I ended up following a ton of people I didn&#039;t want to follow or had no interest in. It helped grow things at first, but I&#039;ve found it&#039;s much better generating followers the good old fashioned way. Besides, if we all continue to cheat the system, the idea of &quot;Twitter Followers&quot; will become insignificant.

Now, the only automation I have set up is to follow people who follow me - I figure that&#039;s a fair practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used similar services in the very beginning of my blogging and I had the same feeling.  I ended up following a ton of people I didn&#8217;t want to follow or had no interest in. It helped grow things at first, but I&#8217;ve found it&#8217;s much better generating followers the good old fashioned way. Besides, if we all continue to cheat the system, the idea of &#8220;Twitter Followers&#8221; will become insignificant.</p>
<p>Now, the only automation I have set up is to follow people who follow me &#8211; I figure that&#8217;s a fair practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
